Archive for April, 2005

Thursday Apr 14 2005

Wi-Fi Advances

Gizmodo posted about this advancement in the state of wi-fi technology this morning. In a nutshell, it makes Wi-Fi devices continually scan for stronger connections in the background so that when your signal on connection one starts to get weak, your device can silently switch to connection two without you noticing.

When I read this, I thought, um, duh. This seems like the sort of common-sense idea that should have been there from the beginning. Cellphones do it — if you’re driving along the highway, your phone is constantly seeking out the nearest tower. So why’d it take this long to make it happen with wi-fi devices?

I have a couple more common-sense ideas about wi-fi. One of them could probably be implemented now. The other needs to wait a few years, for reasons I’ll explain.

(more…)

Wednesday Apr 13 2005

Clone-o-saur

It seems to me, a non-biologist, that we’ve pretty much figured out the cloning process in the time since Dolly was born eight years ago. So how come we aren’t seeing awesome feats of genetic engineering? Why are we stuck with fluorescent bunnies?

Earlier this month, paleontologists extracted soft tissue from a dinosaur’s bone. Isn’t Jurassic Park the next logical step here?

And while the last stuffed Dodo was accidentally burned in 1755, we still have intact skeletons. Can’t we clone ourselves some Dodos?

Also, I want a pony.

Sunday Apr 10 2005

Open Mind Party

Last night while driving, I was listening to John Garabedian’s radio show, “Open House Party” on the radio. He’s a DJ who plays a many-hour-long mix of dance/club/pop tunes on weekend evenings, and is syndicated across the country. While I was listening, he told this story (paraphrased; I wasn’t recording, and there’s no online streaming version of the show):

Last week, radio stations across the country received the CD of “Don’t P-H-U-N-K With My Heart”, the single from their upcoming album “Monkey Business.” Now, apparently a major broadcasting group objected to the use of the word P-H-U-N-K in the title, because they thought it sounded like another, dirtier word, so now the Black Eyed Peas are back in the studio recording a new version called “Don’t Mess With My Heart.” This is what we have to live with in this post-9/11 world under the rule of the Taliban.

While the rhetoric is rather heavy-handed, I applaud John Garabedian’s railing against censorship. I’d bet dollars to donuts he was referring to Clear Channel Communications, a media conglomerate notorious for its censorship and conservative values. But what’s next? “Play That Messy Music White Boy”? “We Want The Mess”? And that much-beloved classic 70’s rock band, “Grand Mess Railroad”?

The real culprit here isn’t Clear Channel, though, it’s the FCC and its recent massive increases in fines for “indecency.” Each incident can net them up to half a million dollars now — a huge victory for people who think the government can decide what we’re offended by more accurately than we can. True conservatives, striving for less governmental power, should be fighting tooth and nail against the mere existence of the FCC’s media-complaints division, which attempts to impose a non-majority-decided morality code on American media companies — governmental meddling at its worst. Instead, many people want the government to “protect” them and their children from words that sound bad and accidentally-exposed breasts, rather than take personal responsibility to deal with this stuff on their own.

In a sensible America, if a media company offended enough people, and those people wanted to punish that media company, they’d stop listening to/watching/buying that company’s products, and the company would be forced through market forces to change its policies. The true moral code of the majority would limit the companies’ use of words and images that actually offended them, and people would have to use their discretion before watching things that they knew might bother them, or letting their children watch television that might be unwelcome in their home.

Wednesday Apr 06 2005

Photos of the Pope

I saw this image today:


Mourners take photos of the body of Pope John Paul II. (AP Photo by Gregorio Borgia. Used without permission.)
Mourners take photos of the body of Pope John Paul II.
(AP Photo by Gregorio Borgia. Used without permission.)

It struck me that these people have traveled from all across the world, some from thousands of miles away, and stood in line for hours upon hours with tens of thousands of others, and they finally get to the body of John Paul II and take his picture with… a cellphone? All that effort, and you’re going to end up with a grainy, blurry digital photo at maybe 640×480 resolution?

Makes you wonder where their priorities are.