Posts tagged ‘culture’

Thursday Aug 18 2005

Wiccans win!

Remember that moronic court decision I posted about in May? (A judge had ruled that a Wiccan couple couldn’t expose their son to “non-mainstream” religious beliefs.) Well, I predicted it’d be overturned in a week… and it’s been overturned, three months later! I was close.

Anyway, hooray for the Indiana Court of Appeals for protecting the religion part of the First Amendment. Now hopefully these people can get back to peaceably practicing their chosen religion without an idiot judge meddling in their affairs.

Friday Aug 12 2005

I don’t know art, but…

A young artist is raising money for her graduate school tuition by painting and selling portraits of Alan Greenspan. That’s great! But why aren’t my watercolors of Carl D. Covitz, ex-undersecretary for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, selling at all?

Thursday Aug 04 2005

Imogen Heap

When Sarah and I bought tickets to see Tori Amos at the end of August, we were especially exicted because, at that time, Imogen Heap was going to be the opening act. Imogen used to be half of the duo Frou Frou, whose excellent album Details is well worth picking up if you like, say, Zero 7, Thievery Corporation, or The Postal Service. Her new single, “Hide and Seek,” was recently featured in the season finale of season 2 of Fox’s hit prime-time soap “The O.C.”, and has since been consistently high on both the U.S. and U.K. iTunes charts. Her new album, “Speak For Yourself”, was just released in the U.K.

However, I recently got notice that Imogen will no longer be opening for Tori. The reason? Well, in Immi’s own words:

Ok…you know that Tori tour…well…erm…it’s not happening. I’m really sorry for anyone who’s already bought tickets in the hope of catching me play. Some of you know I STILL haven’t signed a licensing deal for the states yet (my goodness these things take time!) and it’s now only 3 weeks until it would have kicked off. Also due to the exchange rate it’s almost twice as expensive for a US label to fly me out as ususal and at the start of the album US campaign that is a lot of money gone…

Despite her obvious commercial appeal and amazing success on iTunes, Imogen can’t find a U.S. label to even distribute her new CD, much less pay for a tour. Any U.S. label not leaping at the chance to get this wonderful, talented artist on board is a complete moron. The sales to fans of “The O.C.” alone will be huge. Imogen Heap is an artist to watch, and I’m deeply disappointed that I won’t get to see her perform live.

Thursday Jun 30 2005

Spain, O Spain

Allow me to further extend my admiration and congratulations to Spain, who legalized gay marriage today.

Wednesday Jun 29 2005

Canada, O Canada

Canada, you have my sincerest admiration and respect. Congratulations to you for making same-sex marriage legal. If only those of us in other so-called enlightened nations would follow suit.

Thursday Jun 16 2005

Blame the user, not the tool

Andrés Martinez, a columnist for the L.A. Times, wrote a column yesterday entitled “Who’ll Apologize for the Filibuster? In it, he contends that rather than just apologizing for not passing anti-lynching bills, the Senate should have also apologized for using the filibuster to block passage of those bills. He goes on to claim that the filibuster is utterly worthless — even evil — and should be excised from the Senate’s toolbox, an argument that we’ve been hearing from Frist-supporters a lot lately.

This is utterly stupid. “I’m sorry I wrecked the furniture in a fit of anger, and I’m sorry I used a hammer to do it. If only we didn’t have hammers, everything would have been fine!” Martinez wants to blame the tools used for the actions of their users. According to his logic, guns should be illegal because they can be used to kill people — yet I’m sure he’s as big a supporter of the 2nd Amendment as any other Republican.

Martinez blames Democrats — specifically, Mary Landrieu, D-LA — for keeping “the f-word out of the resolution.” He thinks that the resolution as stated makes it sound like “a majority of senators were on the same moral plane” as the pro-lynching Senators who did the filibustering. How would his resolution have read? “We’re sorry about the lynchings — but it wasn’t our fault!” Helluva sincere apology there, Andrés.

He says that “[t]he filibuster is an anti-democratic instrument that upsets the delicate system of checks and balances already written into the Constitution.” Hang on, I thought that the filibuster was pretty much the last refuge of a beleaguered and largely powerless Senate minority when faced with the prospect of the majority running rampant over their rights and desires. It is the check and balance against pure majority rule in the Senate. If Martinez wants a complete and utter democracy, then why do we even have our representative republic in place? Shouldn’t all votes be put to the masses, and screw the non-whites, non-Christians, non-heterosexuals?

The filibuster is a tool. It’s a utility. It’s never going to be popular with the majority; that’s its whole point. It is the last roadblock, the final riot shield to keep the mob from running rampant over the unpopular guy. It absolutely must be kept in place if we are to keep a semblance of rationality in our Senate and fairness in our government. Removing it would be one more nail in the coffin of true democracy, and one more step down the road toward totalitarianism.

Wednesday Jun 15 2005

The all-suck TV.com

I just sent the following message to CNet:

I am disappointed in the way that you took the helpful, simple, and easy-to-use TVTome and turned it into the hideous, advertisement-covered user-interface nightmare that is TV.com. I used to go to TVTome any time I wanted information about a show; now, after watching my browser struggle through the myriad unnecessary animations and giant images covering the disgustingly designed pages, I’ve decided that I’ll seek out my information elsewhere in the future.

Thanks for ruining a perfectly good web resource. I’m inclined to avoid your websites in the future.

Tuesday May 31 2005

Author stencils

Recently on BoingBoing, a page with a bunch of printable stencils of speculative fiction luminaries was posted. I looked through them, but noticed that three of my favourite authors weren’t in their collection. Inspired, I decided to create my own.

Download these (click them to view them full-size), print them out, attach the printouts to cardboard, and cut out the black sections. Then go stencil-crazy!

Cory Doctorow John Scalzi Charles Stross
Cory Doctorow John Scalzi Charles Stross

Edited to add: This page is an excellent tutorial on how to stencil clothing using a printer, freezer paper, an iron, and fabric paint.

Also: Chris Sullins has created vector-art versions of these stencils that have smoother edges and look generally better all-around.

Saturday May 28 2005

Fleep

A friend pointed out the excellent Fleep webcomic to me yesterday, and I read it this morning. It’s short — only 44 strips — and utterly fascinating. Go read it!

Thursday May 26 2005

Overturning Countdown

How long until this moronic court decision gets overturned? I give it a week at most. I wouldn’t be surprised if the judge caves under public pressure and retracts it before then, though.

How do idiots like this with obvious disregard for the U.S. Constitution manage to become judges? Where along the way do they decide to just ignore some bits of the law?

Wednesday Apr 13 2005

Clone-o-saur

It seems to me, a non-biologist, that we’ve pretty much figured out the cloning process in the time since Dolly was born eight years ago. So how come we aren’t seeing awesome feats of genetic engineering? Why are we stuck with fluorescent bunnies?

Earlier this month, paleontologists extracted soft tissue from a dinosaur’s bone. Isn’t Jurassic Park the next logical step here?

And while the last stuffed Dodo was accidentally burned in 1755, we still have intact skeletons. Can’t we clone ourselves some Dodos?

Also, I want a pony.

Sunday Apr 10 2005

Open Mind Party

Last night while driving, I was listening to John Garabedian’s radio show, “Open House Party” on the radio. He’s a DJ who plays a many-hour-long mix of dance/club/pop tunes on weekend evenings, and is syndicated across the country. While I was listening, he told this story (paraphrased; I wasn’t recording, and there’s no online streaming version of the show):

Last week, radio stations across the country received the CD of “Don’t P-H-U-N-K With My Heart”, the single from their upcoming album “Monkey Business.” Now, apparently a major broadcasting group objected to the use of the word P-H-U-N-K in the title, because they thought it sounded like another, dirtier word, so now the Black Eyed Peas are back in the studio recording a new version called “Don’t Mess With My Heart.” This is what we have to live with in this post-9/11 world under the rule of the Taliban.

While the rhetoric is rather heavy-handed, I applaud John Garabedian’s railing against censorship. I’d bet dollars to donuts he was referring to Clear Channel Communications, a media conglomerate notorious for its censorship and conservative values. But what’s next? “Play That Messy Music White Boy”? “We Want The Mess”? And that much-beloved classic 70’s rock band, “Grand Mess Railroad”?

The real culprit here isn’t Clear Channel, though, it’s the FCC and its recent massive increases in fines for “indecency.” Each incident can net them up to half a million dollars now — a huge victory for people who think the government can decide what we’re offended by more accurately than we can. True conservatives, striving for less governmental power, should be fighting tooth and nail against the mere existence of the FCC’s media-complaints division, which attempts to impose a non-majority-decided morality code on American media companies — governmental meddling at its worst. Instead, many people want the government to “protect” them and their children from words that sound bad and accidentally-exposed breasts, rather than take personal responsibility to deal with this stuff on their own.

In a sensible America, if a media company offended enough people, and those people wanted to punish that media company, they’d stop listening to/watching/buying that company’s products, and the company would be forced through market forces to change its policies. The true moral code of the majority would limit the companies’ use of words and images that actually offended them, and people would have to use their discretion before watching things that they knew might bother them, or letting their children watch television that might be unwelcome in their home.