<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ryan.freebern.org &#187; writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryan.freebern.org/category/writing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryan.freebern.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hope Squashed</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/29/hope-squashed</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/29/hope-squashed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/29/hope-squashed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a response on my story submission today: the editor liked it, but wasn&#8217;t seriously wowed, so he&#8217;s passing on it. At least I gave it a shot &#8212; and since sending it out, I&#8217;ve been looking at more potential markets for it (it&#8217;s a flash horror piece) and I&#8217;ve learned quite a bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a response on my story submission today: the editor liked it, but wasn&#8217;t seriously wowed, so he&#8217;s passing on it. At least I gave it a shot &#8212; and since sending it out, I&#8217;ve been looking at more potential markets for it (it&#8217;s a flash horror piece) and I&#8217;ve learned quite a bit about how it probably falls short, so I have some good ideas for rewriting it before I send it out again. Plus, hey, I&#8217;ve gotta get some rejections under my belt if I want to be considered a real writer!</p>
<p>I was fully prepared for a rejection, so I&#8217;m not upset about it. I learned from this, and I think it&#8217;ll make me a better writer in the end. Now, on to the next story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/29/hope-squashed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Glimmer of Hope</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/27/a-glimmer-of-hope</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/27/a-glimmer-of-hope#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/27/a-glimmer-of-hope</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t said much here about how I&#8217;ve been seriously working on my fiction writing these days. I&#8217;ve put together a few stories over the past month and a half since attending Boskone in mid-February, and I&#8217;ve even sent one of them out as a submission to a paying market two weeks ago. This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t said much here about how I&#8217;ve been seriously working on my fiction writing these days. I&#8217;ve put together a few stories over the past month and a half since attending <a href="http://www.nesfa.org/boskone/">Boskone</a> in mid-February, and I&#8217;ve even sent one of them out as a submission to a paying market two weeks ago. This is the first time I&#8217;ve tried this since I was 16 and I wrote up a 3000-word piece of amateurish hackery and sent it to Asimov&#8217;s and Analog. I kept those rejection letters and still have them, somewhere, I think. But that was a long time ago, when I was young and could barely craft a coherent story, much less one that might be considered by either of those august publications.</p>
<p>When I sent the current story, I had no idea of the editor&#8217;s normal turnaround time, so I wasn&#8217;t getting my hopes up &#8212; many places take six to eight weeks or even more before they get around to reading your story. Today, the editor posted to his blog saying that when he rejects stories, he usually does so within five days of receipt, and anything that&#8217;s not immediately rejected like that is currently in his &#8220;Read Again&#8221; pile. So since I sent my story two weeks ago, I guess that means it&#8217;s at least made it beyond the immediate-rejection phase of the editing process. While I would be seriously surprised (stunned, shocked, bowled over, etc.) if my first story submission was accepted by the first market I sent it to, at least I have a glimmer of hope.</p>
<p>If I try, maybe I can get a second submission sent out before I get word on this one. I don&#8217;t yet have a big pile of polished stories to keep sending out like some writers do, but you&#8217;ve gotta start somewhere, right? And it&#8217;s really nice to know that, even if it doesn&#8217;t get accepted, my writing is at least worth a second look. I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed (which makes it hard to type).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/27/a-glimmer-of-hope/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online/offline web apps</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/01/onlineoffline-web-apps</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/01/onlineoffline-web-apps#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/01/onlineoffline-web-apps</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do all my writing in Google Docs these days, and I love it. It&#8217;s simple and straightforward &#8212; I can write my stories, and it saves them for me and helps me organize them, and that&#8217;s it. It doesn&#8217;t have tons of fancy bells and whistles that I don&#8217;t need and it lets me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do all my writing in <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> these days, and I love it. It&#8217;s simple and straightforward &#8212; I can write my stories, and it saves them for me and helps me organize them, and that&#8217;s it. It doesn&#8217;t have tons of fancy bells and whistles that I don&#8217;t need and it lets me fit a whole lot of text on the screen instead of cluttering it up with toolbars and rulers and stuff. And nicest of all, no matter where I am, if I can get to the internet I can work on my writing.</p>
<p>The problem is that when my internet connection goes down, like it did today, I can&#8217;t access any of my work. There was a problem with our cable service for about three hours this afternoon, and I sat here stewing, thinking &#8220;What can I do to pass the time until it&#8217;s fixed? Oh, I know. I&#8217;ll do some writing!&#8221; And then I realized my fallacy.</p>
<p>There is <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=356">evidence</a> that Google is planning on making an offline version of Docs, but right now it looks like it requires running the code on a local webserver installation, which is not optimal. Come on! It&#8217;s almost entirely javascript already &#8212; why not make use of the nicely-polished, awesome offline storage solution <a href="http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2006/04/now-in-browser-near-you-offline-access.html">dojo.storage</a>? It uses one of any number of available offline storage providers (a fancy name for &#8220;things on your computer that let your browser save stuff to disk&#8221;) to allow you to store data locally, and lets you sync the local and remote copies when you do have internet access. There are already demos showing that it works safely. Google really needs to take advantage of this neat thing, to make Docs available even when my network connection isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I briefly pondered trying to integrate <a href="http://www.greasespot.net/">Greasemonkey</a> and dojo.storage to forcibly add this feature to Docs, but then realized that first, it would take way too much effort to both decipher Google&#8217;s code and learn dojo.storage, and second, I don&#8217;t have the time for that sort of stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/03/01/onlineoffline-web-apps/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writers&#8217; brains work differently</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/28/writers-brains-work-differently</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/28/writers-brains-work-differently#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/28/writers-brains-work-differently</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Lamott, Operating Instructions: One small difference in our reaction [to the 1989 San Francisco earthquake] was that Julie, near tears, sat staring at the set, wondering out loud if her husband was still alive, while I was rather horrified to discover that I was worried about how this would affect sales of the book. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Lamott, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Operating-Instructions-Journal-Sons-First/dp/1400079098/sr=8-1/qid=1172683080/tag2=corknutorg"><i>Operating Instructions</i></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One small difference in our reaction [to the 1989 San Francisco earthquake] was that Julie, near tears, sat staring at the set, wondering out loud if her husband was still alive, while I was rather horrified to discover that I was worried about how this would affect sales of the book. This made me feel just great about myself, as you can imagine.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/28/writers-brains-work-differently/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subconscious idea theft</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/27/subconscious-idea-theft</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/27/subconscious-idea-theft#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/27/subconscious-idea-theft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you do when your brain is totally stuck on a great idea, but you&#8217;re afraid you&#8217;ve subconsciously stolen it from someone else? I bought Tobias Buckell&#8216;s book Crystal Rain recently. The cover depicts people in flying blimplike wooden ships, swashbuckling fearlessly. I haven&#8217;t read it yet, as I&#8217;ve been working my way through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you do when your brain is totally stuck on a great idea, but you&#8217;re afraid you&#8217;ve subconsciously stolen it from someone else?</p>
<p>I bought <a href="http://www.tobiasbuckell.com">Tobias Buckell</a>&#8216;s book <i>Crystal Rain</i> recently. The cover depicts people in flying blimplike wooden ships, swashbuckling fearlessly. I haven&#8217;t read it yet, as I&#8217;ve been working my way through <a href="http://www.uberreview.com/2007/02/book-review-david-maruseks-getting-to-know-you.htm/">Dave Marusek&#8217;s &#8220;Getting to Know You&#8221;</a> first, but in the meantime my brain has been pondering the whole flying-ships thing, and has invented the basic underpinnings of a watery world with steampunk flying ships. It&#8217;s the sort of thing where as I&#8217;m drifting off to sleep, I&#8217;ll think &#8220;Hey, <em>that&#8217;s</em> how the ships fly,&#8221; or I&#8217;ll wake up and think &#8220;Ooh, I know where they can get an energy-rich fuel source for their steam engines!&#8221;</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m a little upset that this world my brain is busy thinking up in the background is going to turn out to be way too similar to the <i>Crystal Rain</i> world, and I&#8217;ll feel like I&#8217;m just ripping Buckell off if I actually write anything in it. What do I do? Forge ahead and hope it turns out different enough? Give up on it until I&#8217;ve read <i>Crystal Rain</i>, hoping that his world will turn out to be significantly different and mine will still be usable?</p>
<p>And if I do read <i>Crystal Rain</i>, I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ll end up wanting desperately to appropriate Buckell&#8217;s cool ideas into my own, thereby turning my work, effectively, into unpublishable fanfiction. I don&#8217;t want that to happen, since I want what I write to at least be something that an editor would consider buying, and fanfiction definitely doesn&#8217;t fall into that category.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll give up and write a vampire story set in the future on a jungle planet, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/27/subconscious-idea-theft/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good habits are so time-consuming</title>
		<link>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/24/good-habits-are-so-time-consuming</link>
		<comments>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/24/good-habits-are-so-time-consuming#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Freebern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/24/good-habits-are-so-time-consuming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best way I&#8217;ve found of getting into good habits is making a schedule for them and sticking to it. I go to the gym every two days (unless I&#8217;m out of town or something) like clockwork, and by doing so I manage to keep doing it regularly. In the past, I&#8217;ve scheduled two hours [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way I&#8217;ve found of getting into good habits is making a schedule for them and sticking to it. I go to the gym every two days (unless I&#8217;m out of town or something) like clockwork, and by doing so I manage to keep doing it regularly. In the past, I&#8217;ve scheduled two hours of writing time first thing in the morning three days a week, and I got a lot of writing done that way. These days, I&#8217;m making myself read for at least half an hour a day so I can try to get caught up on my book backlog, and it&#8217;s starting to do the trick &#8212; I&#8217;m plowing through books pretty quickly. I schedule my next haircut immediately after getting one done, so I know that, four weeks later, I&#8217;ll be obliged to come in and get it done.</p>
<p>The things I don&#8217;t schedule are the ones that sit around not getting done for weeks on end. I don&#8217;t vacuum carpets as often as I should, since I have no schedule for it. I get way behind on watching the TV shows I follow, since it&#8217;s tough to find the time.</p>
<p>These good habits have a net positive effect on my life, because when I do them (each individual time, and overall) I feel better about myself. I&#8217;m proud that I&#8217;ve been exercising regularly for a month and a half, and swimming fairly regularly for a couple years. I&#8217;m happy when I write, even if what I write isn&#8217;t something I&#8217;m terribly proud of.</p>
<p>But developing good habits (like exercising and writing) is really time-consuming. I already feel like my days are packed, and then fitting in an hour of working out or two hours of writing just makes me wonder what I&#8217;m going to have to give up to get it done. The weird thing is, it doesn&#8217;t seem like I am giving anything up, actually. Somehow, I manage to do these productive activities and still find the time I need to do my day job, read the blogs in my aggregator, and keep the house in a state of, uh, controlled chaos at least. So maybe good habits aren&#8217;t really as time-consuming as I think. Maybe their positive effect drives me to be more efficient in the other areas of my life, which almost means they&#8217;re actually creating more time for me.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t feel busy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryan.freebern.org/2007/02/24/good-habits-are-so-time-consuming/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
